Search This Blog

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Home Birth

**We've moved!!**


Please visit our new site, ModernAlternativeMama.com.


Comments on this post have been locked and updates are no longer being made to this page. Please click here to view this article on the new site.


**Note: Homebirth is a beautiful and SAFE experience for babies everywhere. Babies used to be born at home and still should be. The U.S. has the highest rate of interventions of any developed country -- AND the highest infant mortality rate. Parenting is all about choosing what is best for your baby and home birth, for many moms, is it. Even if you would not be comfortable at home, and would not choose home birth, please don't insult the moms who do. They have carefully studied their options (no matter what their age) and have chosen what is absolutely best for them. Please be respectful in your comments even if you disagree. **

If you've read Daniel's birth story at the beginning of this blog, you already know he was born at home. So, clearly, I am pro-home birth. But why? Why would someone choose to have a home birth? Is it safe? Where would you find attendants? There is a lot to consider when you are thinking about having a home birth.

First of all, you should birth where you are most comfortable. For some people, that truly is the hospital, because they feel too nervous about the "what ifs" involved in childbirth and/or they like an environment where they really don't have to worry about anything, they are taken care of. But for a lot of people, home is the most comfortable environment, because home is what is familiar. For those women, they should be able to birth at home, and should have access to midwives so they can do so safely (I'll be discussing the issues surrounding midwives and home births from a legal standpoint in another post).

If you are considering a home birth, the first thing you should do is find a qualified midwife. This does NOT necessarily mean a nurse-midwife; there are also certified professional midwives. In some states CPMs are legal, and in others (including here), they aren't. If you ask around, you'll probably find the same few names coming up over and over. There's a community of "natural" parents, including home-birthers, in every major area. Some are luckier than others though! You can also look at DONA or NACPM (National Association of Certified Professional Midwives), or NARM (North American Registry of Midwives).

Sit down with the midwife you've chosen and ask LOTS of questions. Here is a brief of things you really must ask, but add to this list anything you're wondering about, including your attitudes towards birth, fears, desires, etc.

1) How much training have you had? Do you have any certifications? Which?
2) How long have you been a midwife?
3) How many babies have you delivered?
4) What are your birth statistics (inc. hospital transfers and reasons why, any maternal/neonatal deaths and causes, average birth weight, c-sections, etc.)?
5) Have you ever had any unusual birth situations (cord prolapse, unknown breech, etc.)? How did you handle them?
6) How and why do you recommend a woman to go the hospital? What happens if I need to go?
7) What happens if you are unavailable for my birth? Do you have a back up?
8) What is your philosophy on birth?
9) What is your role in my birth? How much control will I have? What about writing a birth plan?
10) Do you do water births? Hypnobirths? (Or any other type you want)
11) What happens in an emergency, if we can't drive to the hospital? Are you trained in CPR or other resuscitation? Do you bring any equipment with you?
12) What do I need to supply for the birth?
13) Do you have any reference families I can contact?
14) How often will I see you? Will you do prenatal care for me?
15) Do you use a back-up doctor or do you recommend I see one? If so, who?
16) If I need to go to the hospital, do you recommend a particular one?
17) Do you do any routine testing or exams? What type?
18) Do you have any limits on who can attend my birth? If so, why?
19) At what point do you consider me full term? What if I go into labor early?
20) Is there anything else I need to know about home birth or you?

Make sure that you get a sense of your midwife's attitude towards birth. Hopefully, you will find one who is very open to your ideas and wishes in birthing, is well-trained in CPR and resuscitations, can do basic prenatal care, is cautious and willing to refer you to a doctor at any point if you become high-risk or if there are any problems or concerns at all (from either of you). The midwife should be willing to allow whoever you want at the birth, be certified and well-trained (having attended no fewer than 30 births, which should occur during training). The midwife should carry equipment with her in case of emergency (oxygen) and be familiar with what to do for cord prolapse, hemmorhage, etc. She should do routine testing for hemoglobin levels, and for protein/sugar in your urine, but most other testing is unnecessary. Although, she should know where to go in case you would prefer to do other testing and be willing to work with you on that. She should not perform internal exams up until labor unless there is a problem, in which case she should probably refer you to a doctor. She should recommend a particular doctor(s) and hospital in case of emergency, and officially say a back up doctor is fine, even if she does not require you to have one. The most important thing is that you feel comfortable with her, and feel that she is trained, can handle your birth and any complications (hoping for none) and that her attitude and philosophy meshes well with yours.

In some states, if the midwives are legal, they will be able to actually attend your birth in a hospital, if you require transfer. In others, where midwives are NOT legal, they will function as a doula or labor coach in the event of a transfer. This is still desirable because midwives can discuss options with the doctors and advocate for you. This way if the doctor says "You really need..." your midwife, who is experienced, can advise you on whether that treatment is really necessary (in many cases it will be, because you don't go to the hospital from a planned homebirth for no reason, but still, it's good to have a midwife to help you sort through your options). It is also important to note that some midwives consider you full term at 36 weeks; others at 37. Most will not attend a birth prior to whatever they consider full term, and will send you straight to the hospital for any premature labor.

You should see a midwife as often as you would otherwise see a doctor. That is, monthly from 8 - 28 weeks, bi-weekly from 28 - 36 weeks, and weekly from 36 weeks - birth. You should also have a home visit from your midwife around 36 or 37 weeks, so that she knows how to get to you, and so that she can verify that you have all your homebirth supplies and that you are ready. Because after this point, you could go into labor at any time!

At each midwife appointment, you should meet for a full hour, or at least a half hour. The appointments shouldn't be 5 - 10 minutes like a doctor's, because your midwife should spend time getting to know you, your husband, your children (if any), and to learn as much as she can about what you are looking for in your pregnancy and birth experience. Early in your care, your midwife should take a detailed history on you. If you have any previous obstetrical history, your midwife should ask you about it in detail. She should also ask about your mother and sisters. If you have had any previous complications, your midwife will want to know what, and why. For example, if you've had a previous c-section for a breech baby, this is unlikely to occur again and is not a concern. But if you've had preeclampsia in the past, this is a concern and could disqualify you from home birth. In general, your midwife should screen you early in your pregnancy to see if you are a good candidate for home birth. The following may disqualify you:

*A complicated gynecological history (frequently missed periods for no reason, PCOS, etc.)
*Multiple miscarriages
*History pre-term labor
*History of pre-eclampsia or HELLP syndrome
*Uncontrolled or difficult diabetes
*History of gestational diabetes
*History of c-sections for circumstances likely to repeat
*Previous hemorrhage
*History of neonatal complications
*Any indications of high-risk pregnancy (multiple miscarriage scares, bleeding, unusual cramping, threatened pre-term labor, etc.)
*Multiple pregnancy (twins, triplets)

Some midwives will disqualify you just for having diabetes, including gestational, or any c-sections (they don't want to attend a VBAC). You may also get disqualified late in pregnancy due to a breech baby (though some will keep seeing you in case the baby turns). Some will attempt a twin birth at home, but it depends on the position of the twins near term; most won't attempt higher multiples at home. It's possible that, if you have a history with this midwife, she will care for you even with some problems because she knows your history, whereas she would not take you on as a new client. If you are potentially high-risk, the midwife should recommend that you see a doctor in addition, so that you can transfer your care if necessary.

At each appointment, you should discuss any problems, questions, or concerns that you have. Your midwife should weigh you, or at least ask if you've weighed yourself (this is more important towards the end of your pregnancy, because a rapid weight gain can signal the beginning of pre-eclampsia. Some women do not want to be weighed in the first half of their pregnancy, and in healthy women, this can be okay -- ask). Your midwife should also take a look at your diet and advise you on how you can eat better for your baby (she should recommend 80 - 100 grams of protein per day, among other things). Your midwife may recommend a particular "pregnancy tea" (containing oatstraw, red raspberry leaf, alfalfa, and other herbs) and possibly a prenatal vitamin. If your hemoglobin is low (below 12), she may recommend spirulina to bring it up. Your midwife should also do prenatal care: listen for baby's heart tones (with a doppler or fetoscope), feel for baby's position, and after 20 weeks, measure fundal height. Your midwife should also have you check for any protein or sugar in your urine, and if any is found, follow up with further testing (it can be a sign of gestational diabetes or preeclampsia). Some midwives will also have you test your blood sugar at home for a week while eating normal meals (and will advise you on the proper way to do this testing) to determine if you are at risk or showing signs of gestational diabetes, and will recommend follow-up testing if necessary, or perhaps a diet change. The ACOG now says that for women with no history of diabetes who are under 25, no glucose testing is necessary anyway.

Your midwife will also attempt to assess your ideas, thoughts, and feelings about birth and all related issues. This means if you are a victim of abuse (sexual or otherwise), your midwife will attempt to discuss this, work through it with you, and refer you to a counselor if necessary. If there are family members or friends putting pressure on you because they do not agree with your choices, she will discuss this with you too.

Your midwife should also give you her immediate contact information: phone number and email (preferably cell phone) so that if you have an emergency, or if the baby is coming, you can call her and reach her immediately. This is IMPORTANT. I have heard many stories of people I know personally, just in the last few months, of having their babies in 15 min. - 2 hours after the first contraction, and in many cases, the midwife didn't even make it! For this reason, you and your husband should also attend a birthing class (your midwife should recommend one, and/or teach you this information) to learn how to deliver a baby, just in case you are alone when the baby comes.

You will also need to buy birthing supplies. Many midwives will put together birthing kits that you can buy directly from them, or from a source they will provide you. You are also able to go and buy your own supplies. A basic list includes:

*Chux pads, large and small (20 - 30)
*Latex gloves
*A birthing pool with liner (if desired)
*Several towels, sterilized (your midwife should tell you how, but seal them in a paper bag and bake for 2 - 3 hours at 200 degrees)
*Baby hat
*Nasal aspirator
*Peri bottle(s)
*Sterilized washcloths and hot water in a crockpot (for perineum compresses)
*Ice packs (for after)
*Mattress pads
*Large trash bags
*Cord tape
*Straws
*Juice/cereal to snack on
*Large bowls (for placenta, and in case you get sick)
*Pads for after the birth (like menstrual pads, but big)

Your midwife may have a different list of supplies. She may also require additional items that you already have around the home (extra sheets for your bed, blankets to wrap the baby in, etc.). It is important to gather ALL the supplies that your midwife requests, organize and label them, and have them in the room you intend to birth at least 4 weeks before your due date. You may also choose to have additional supplies that you want: camera or video camera, special outfit/diaper for after birth, music to play, candles to light, massage oil, birthing ball, special outfit for you, etc. Select all these in advance and put them near your birthing supplies. If you want certain pictures, make sure you have someone who is NOT coaching you who can take them, and that they understand what you do -- and DON'T -- want pictures of (i.e. "don't take a picture of me naked!" or "don't get the head crowning!" etc.). It may be a good idea to invite someone you trust just to take pictures, if this is important to you.

If you want a birthing tub, you can rent one (usually around $200). This is fine...but you can also buy one. There are pools from $30 - $1200. We bought a kiddie pool called the Aquarium pool for $30 and it was just fine. It was strong, had 3 separate inflatable rings (important, so you can adjust the height as necessary) and the sides were strong enough to lean/lay on. The pool should be 22 - 28" deep, and it depends on your height. The size of the pool matters, too, depending on whether you want your husband in with you. 6 ft. in diameter should be big enough for a second person, but talk to your midwife about specific recommendations or ask others who've had water births.

If you have older children, you must decide whether or not they will attend the birth. If the birth occurs at night, a lot of people will let their children sleep; if you have children who are much older (7 or so), they may want to be woken for the birth. It is a good idea to have a helper for the child(ren) who can be present for the birth if the child(ren) wants to be, but is willing to leave if not. We called our friend, Lindsey, to come and watch Bekah during Daniel's birth, which worked out for the best. Next time we will probably allow her to watch -- if she wants to. Some children really just want to be with their mothers and observing the birth is in everyone's best interests; it can also foster a strong bond between siblings. However, some children are a distraction or cannot stand to see their mother in pain and do not want to witness the birth. Either way, children can come back as soon as the baby is born and meet their new sibling in the first moments of his/her life, which is equally special. This is an issue you should discuss thoroughly with your midwife, but remember to be flexible. We had assumed Bekah WOULD want to witness the birth because we thought if she were downstairs and knew I was nearby, she would throw a fit about not getting to be with me. But it turned out she was quite happy to play with friends, and much fussier and clingier when she was with me (which I didn't need right then!).

It's important to note that, in labor, you will probably have a point where you say "I can't do this anymore!" If you MEAN it, your support people should be willing to take you to the hospital, even if nothing is really wrong (you are just exhausted). But be aware that nearly every woman says this, and it means you are either in transition or right around the corner from it. Also, no matter how logical you think you are at this point, you are not. Trust your support people and if they try to convince you to stay home, and talk you through a few more contractions, give it a shot. It may be just what you need.

I said that -- "I can't do it!" I thought I was logical. I said "I'm not making any progress; if I were I could do it. But I'm not. So it is logical to want to go to the hospital and get help. I am nowhere near transition." My husband and midwives had a little pow-wow in another room that I learned about later, where he told them I didn't mean it (although I did, the idea of actually having to pack a bag, get in a car, and then be away from my home and my daughter for a day seemed overwhelming and wrong) and then he coaxed me into the pool we'd set up. It turned out I entered transition right after that and my son was born only an hour or so later. It is important to let people help you! And listen to them even if you don't really want to!

Finally, READ everything you can. Read birth stories. Talk to other people who've had home births. Talk to midwives (even if you aren't totally sold on the idea). Write down all your thoughts and fears (I did). Read books on natural child birth and relaxation techniques. Learn all you can about birthing naturally, and it may put your fears at ease. Honestly, having given birth both in a hospital with an epidural, and at home with no drugs, I would have a baby at home tomorrow (even though I am tired right now...I would STILL be happy to be in labor, to be in pain, to be exhausted again...because it is amazing!). I would be eager, and excited to do it. Really! But I would never want to do it in a hospital again. I can't wait until I have another baby, at home.

Here are a few resources for you:
In His Hands (birth supplies; we ordered mine from them)
Mama Goddess (birth supplies)
Your Water Birth (water birthing supplies)
Home Birth Forum (at mothering.com)
Johanna's Birth Story (at Keeper of the Home)
Home Birth Stories
Birth Stories

I have two more exciting things to tell you!

In the next few months, I'd love to post encouraging, natural birth stories. If you would like to submit yours (they don't have to be home births, but drug-free please), email it to me (leave a comment with your email, which will be hidden, and I'll send you my email then). I think we all need that encouragement!

Also, I am currently working on a cookbook that will feature Real Food recipes and cooking tips for cooks new to cooking and Real Foods. The sales from this book will benefit women who do not have the means to pay for midwives and doulas and other alternative birth care. Most of this will be going to CHOICE (these are the midwives I used). So, look for more details on this book and please consider buying one to support this worthy organization! The book will come in January, and there is a true need for money to support this type of organization right now. More on why in a couple weeks.

Where did you have your babies? Were you satisfied with your experience? Have you had a home birth or would you consider one?

16 comments:

  1. No, I wouldn't consider a home birth. It is not the best environment for the baby if there are complications, and the baby's health is more important than the mother's birthing experience. Birth is ALL about the baby and his or her well-being.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The U.S. has the highest rate of birth interventions in the developed world -- AND the highest infant mortality rate. Numerous studies have shown that home births are SAFER than hospital births. Countries where most babies are born either at home or in birthing centers with midwives and which have very low rates of intervention have lower infant mortality rates. So, yes, birth is about the baby's safety...and baby is SAFEST AT HOME.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The baby is safest at home only if there is NO CHANCE of complication. Since there is a chance of complication during every child's birth, the hospital is obviously the safest place.

    Your theory that home birth is safer is like saying private schools are more successful than public schools. Of course they are, they don't take any children with special needs and only serve the cream of the crop. No intervention is necesssary or provided.

    Home birth statistics may safer, but only because anyone with complications is sent TO THE HOSPITAL for medical intervention. If ALL babies were really safer at home, then none of your disqualifications listed above would apply. Please cite the studies that state home birth is safer for ALL babies.

    Infant mortality is high in the U.S. because some babies are delivered IN HOSPITALS well before 36-40 weeks gestation (think Michelle Duggar). If interventions were not tried, many more of these pre-term babies would die. Thus, more interventions and higher infant mortatilty. My guess is that the parents of these babies are quite happy that the hopsitals and inteventions are available to their children.

    Home birth is about the mother's control of her "birthing experience." Children don't remember their birth and thus have no memory of their "experience" - ask anyone to recount the details fo their own birth and they will be unable to do so. Babies with complications are more likely to survive in a hospital with a Level 1 neonatal unit. The point really can't be argued, Kate.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous,

    If you read the original post, you would see that midwives will weed out anyone who is high risk. These people should see doctors and go to hospitals. But for low-risk women (75% of all births), they are safer at home. All NORMAL babies are safer at home. Midwives are trained to look for any risk factors (breech, low fluid, cord prolapse, anything unusual) and do not hesitate to refer women. Women WITHOUT these risk factors (again, most) are perfectly safe at home.

    Are you trying to say that other developed countries don't have the same rate of pre-term births or other issues that we do, and that's why our infant mortality rate is higher? I don't think that's true at all. I think that all countries have -- or SHOULD have -- approximately the same rates of babies born with serious issues. The U.S. isn't the only country with mothers who have preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, etc. So, no, our infant mortality rate isn't higher for that reason, as you've implied. The infant mortality rates from the other countries include ALL babies born, at home or in the hospital -- and they're still lower. And many of those babies happen to be born at home or in birthing centers with minimal interventions.

    Not to mention that women SHOULD be empowered that to have the birthing experiences they want. It is their body and they should have some control. It's been shown that mothers who are interfered with don't have the same bonding experiences as mothers who are left alone. In the animal kingdom, animal mothers will actually reject their babies if they are interfered with. Humans don't, but I believe that the natural pain and hormones are necessary to aid early bonding. No, babies don't remember their own births. But they will remember the bonding and resulting love for the rest of their lives.

    So, to sum up -- IF THERE ARE SERIOUS RISK FACTORS, GO TO A HOSPITAL (premature birth, breech birth, multiples, preeclampsia, etc.). Otherwise, babies ARE safer born at home.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous,

    Just as another point to ponder -- saying that ALL babies are safest in the hospital, despite a very, very low risk of complications in most cases is like saying that you MIGHT get thyroid disease someday, so you should just remove it now. Or you might get breast cancer, so why not have a mastectomy now to avoid it? (Don't laugh -- some women are actually doing that.) But why in the world would you EVER do that? You don't mess up what isn't broken.

    Not to mention that for low-risk women, the chance of complications CAUSED BY THE HOSPITAL is far higher than the risk of complications at home. It's unlikely that a woman at home would suddenly need help (most go to the hospital for exhaustion or wanting pain meds, not because they have an emergency), and midwives are trained to handle emergencies in case they occur. But if you go to a hospital, even as very low-risk, you WILL get an IV. Then you will have to stay in bed. You will probably end up with pitocin because labor isn't progressing "fast enough" based on an arbitrary, unreliable, external contraction monitor. Then your water will be broken to move it along more, and internal monitors will be used. Then you end up with vacuum extractions and/or c-sections for "failure to progress." This doesn't even address the extremely high induction and unnecessary c-section rates. (Women who need c-sections: about 4%. Women who get them: 30 - 50%, depending on the area.) This is what happened during my daughter's birth, for reasons I know were unnecessary. Clearly I can -- and did -- birth with no help.

    So, it is very risky to go to a hospital and receive unnecessary interventions. Riskier than staying home for low-risk women.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Final thought: hospital-acquired infections. At home there are few germs and they're all familiar, so it's unlikely the baby would get sick. But in a hospital there is MRSA and all kinds of stuff that can spread easily, and be very dangerous to babies. So...hospitals, no thanks. All my healthy, normal babies will be born at home.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Home birth is stil all about what is best for mommy, not baby. All of the interventions you mentioned affect the mother not the child. Who cares? The birth is about achieving the best outcome for THE BABY. The germs at home won't be familiar to the baby; it hasn't been exposed to them. The monitors, pitocin, and even c-sections affect the mother, not the baby.

    I do think our infant mortality rate is higher because the U.S. serves more women with higher risk pregnancies. Are you implying that infants die because they are born in hospitals?

    Do you really think that comparing humans who can REASON to animals who can't reason is a way to make a point? Humans can decide to bond with their babies regardless of the circumstances of their birth. This ability to think is what separates us from animals.

    I hope all of your pregnancies go well and you can have the birth experiences you want. I had gestational diabetes with my first pregnancy and my second child had a prolapsed cord. Both conditions were found by my wonderful obstetricians, both children were born in hospitals with level 1 neonatal intensive care units (just in case though not necessary, thank God), both children thrived. The interventions that were performed on me were of minor to no consideration; I simply wanted healthy children. By the way, we bonded just fine.

    Lastly, in your original post I had trouble finding a sentence that didn't contain a personal pronoun (I, me, my, mine - in case you've forgotten). Your point-of-view clearly indicates who the home birth is all about - you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Are you suggesting that c-sections, pitocin, etc. does not affect the baby? That drugs don't cross the placenta? That any stress that results on the mother doesn't affect the baby? OF COURSE it does. What's best for mom is usually what's best for baby.

    And, again: moms SHOULD have the birthing experience they want. It is a major event in a woman's life. It is an important part of the bonding experience. You are free to NOT choose home birth, but please do not say it isn't safe for those who DO desire it. We are lucky to have options here, limited as they may be. I strongly believe in home birth for the safety and comfort of moms AND babies.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous,

    Just noting that this is my last comment to you. It is clear you do not agree and I will not convince you. This discussion is no longer productive, so I won't be participating further, and no more comments from you will be posted unless the specifically further a rational discussion. Quite honestly, if you disagree so strongly, I am not sure why you keep reading the blog. But, we've each said what we think and believe and this is the end of the discussion now.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Before I say this, let this be clear: I am not pregnant, and I do not have a child, so I do not have any personal experience with giving birth. I do, however, have TONS of people around me (I know 3 married women who don't have kids, aren't pregnant, or aren't trying to become pregnant, and this is including my entire church and everyone I work with) who have babies, are trying to have babies, and the like.

    The problem I have with hospital births right now is the 'forcing the baby to wake up to feed' routine. Everyone with a baby under 1 that I know was woken up at the hospital along with their baby every two hours in the night instead of allowing the child to sleep like it needed. What is the point of that? The baby will eat when it is hungry - I've never known a hungry baby who didn't make it known to the entire world as soon as he/she was hungry.

    I'm also not a fan of the idea of being pumped full of drugs that we've decided are necessary in order to give birth. I try to avoid taking unnecessary medications - so why, then, after thousands of years of giving birth without any need for these medicines are they suddenly something that every woman wants to have? Nurses can tell when a baby's mother was induced without seeing the mom, and they can tell if she's had an epidural based off of how the baby acts after being born. So why do people think that there is 'no difference' between a drug-free birth and a drugged one?

    Those are just my two cents on the matter.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Kate-

    I'm not sure why you won't post more comments from me, but whatever. My arguments are just as rational as yours; they are just different. I read your blog to see your point-of-view. I read editorials in the newspaper from writers whose opinions differ from mine; I read books whose authors have different opinions than mine. If you are not open to differing opinions, why do you post yours? Do you only want readers who agree with you? If that is the case, you have no hope for advancing your ideas and your blog is really an online journal. I guess I am wondering what your purpose for writing is? Changing minds and presenting your ideas or simply documenting your life?

    Emma, most hospitals let the mom keep the baby in her room if she wants. This allows the mother to wake to feed the baby when the baby needs to be fed. The forced waking you describe occurs when the mother doesn't want to "room-in" with the baby. I know it happens, but I really can't imagine a mother not wanting her baby in her room. It says more about the mother than it does about the hospital. If the hospital your friends are going to doesn't offer rooming-in, they should find a different hospital.

    I agree there are differences between drug-free births and those where the mother chooses or needs drugs. Avoiding drugs is the best choice, when possible. Unfortunately, life isn't always so tidy. I had pitocin with my first child because I had gestational diabetes. She was almost 10 lbs. and my placenta was deteriorating due to the diabetes. It was not a choice I wanted to make, but it was what was best for the baby. The good news is I went on to have another child with whom I did not have gestational diabetes, and I had no drugs during labor. Both children thrived, and I bonded equally well with both of them. When you decide to have a child(ren), I hope all goes perfectly for you and especially for your child(ren). Expect the best and prepare for the worst!

    ReplyDelete
  12. The constant waking does occur in the hospital even when you're rooming in with your baby. I had Bekah in a hospital and she never left my side, but they still came in every 2 - 3 hours to check on us and wake us and try to make Bekah eat. At home, Daniel nursed within an hour of birth, and then he slept for 11 straight hours. He was closely watched by either me or my husband but that's what babies typically want to do -- sleep.

    I do want comments from people with different opinions. But not from people who want to imply I am a bad parent if I don't agree with them, or if I choose something they wouldn't. I don't feel saying that birth is all about me and I am selfish is furthering a discussion on the merits of home birth. It also divides mothers who are all trying to do their best. That is why I said that.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I didn't imply you were a bad parent. I said that hospitals are always the safest option because there are medical professionals on hand to deal with complications. NO birth is guaranteed not to have complications, so home births are a calculated risk. My OPINION is that it is best to err on the side of caution in all cases. I'm sure my opinion was formed from my experience of having had two babies that had complications. Experience is a rude teacher.

    You can make whatever choice you wish, but it is a choice mothers make to enhance their own birthing experience since we both agree that the babies do not remember their own birth.

    Now I am finished talking about this as well. I hope all of your future births are uncomplicated and are a good experience for you.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous,

    I read a lot of comments before I read yours, and may have mixed them up when I responded to you intially. I apologize if I was rude or hard on you. I still do believe that women should have the right to birth wherever they feel most comfortable. So, for you, that was the hospital, and that's great! For me, that was at home. I did have Bekah in a hospital and it was not the experience I wanted and I did have trouble bonding with her in the early months. I hate to admit that, but that's the truth. After my son was born and I realized how different I felt, I cried for what I felt I'd lost in the early months with her. That's the perspective I'm coming from. I also feel very sure that my midwives (I had two) would have sent me to the hospital quickly at any point had I needed to go, either before the birth, during, or after. We are only 10 minutes away. I felt (and still feel) that we could get to a hospital before any trouble really arose if we really needed to, that we would make it to help on time. That is something that people who do not live as close to a hospital as I do should take into consideration, obviously.

    Generally, I strongly believe women should have a choice where they birth, and that they should have the means to actually experience what they choose. Every part of life is a calculated risk (like getting into a car everyday), but sometimes it's truly worth it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. What about in cases where its a normal low risk pregnancy, and pretty normal delivery (just fast)... and the case of the baby is not so normal. I'm not anti homebirth, actually seriously considered it for this pregnancy... but my son would not have lived had I had one. Thats my hang up, no one can say he would have been safer at home, I guess you could argue that if he cant make a 10 minute ambulance ride to the hospital, to live would be playing god... but I guess I would rather play god...

    Amy (yup the one you know :))

    ReplyDelete
  16. Amy,

    It's hard to say what to do in a circumstance like yours. I don't know enough about what exactly happened to say. But there are differences in the way situations are handled at home vs. in the hospital that can change the outcome. For example, if a baby is born in a hospital with the cord wrapped around his neck, it will be immediately cut and he'll be whisked to the NICU and put on machines for awhile. At home, the baby will be delivered carefully and the cord left intact for quite awhile (an hour usually) and the baby given oxygen on the mom's chest if necessary. I know because Daniel was born with his cord wrapped pretty tightly around his neck. And he is fine. I tend to believe that he may not have been if his cord had been cut too soon, because once it was unwrapped, he was getting oxygen through it while he learned to breathe and got oxygen from the machine briefly too. I think if we'd cut it we would have ended up in the hospital for breathing issues. I can't PROVE that. But I feel like there are such different practices between midwives and OBs, home and hospital, that it's just hard to say what a baby's outcome would have truly been in one location vs. another, unless a specific, tragic thing happened (cord prolapse, torn placenta, maternal hemorrhage, etc.). It's a TOUGH choice. One that everyone has to make, based on what they know and believe, and hope and pray it is right. I know we were better off at home. I can't say that would be true for everyone.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.